<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Hands-on with T-Mobile's revised Shadow</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/07/hands-on-with-t-mobiles-revised-shadow/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Hands-on with T-Mobile's revised Shadow</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with T-Mobile's revised Shadow]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/07/hands-on-with-t-mobiles-revised-shadow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/07/hands-on-with-t-mobiles-revised-shadow/</guid><description><![CDATA[It looks sweet, but I still prefer the original stylings of the first Shadow (HTC Phoebus). <br><br>Americans had better not complain, but in this generation of Windows Mobile Standard devices, the U.K. only has the HTC Rose (S74x) while the U.S. has both the Rose and the new Shadow.<br><br>I actually prefer Windows Mobile's non touch screen OS. A pity that Vodafone never released the Vodafone 920 (HTC Kii) here in the U.K. I think it would have done well.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ZSX]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 8th 2009 9:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Hands-on with T-Mobile's revised Shadow]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/07/hands-on-with-t-mobiles-revised-shadow/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/07/hands-on-with-t-mobiles-revised-shadow/</guid><description><![CDATA[does it have a plastic screen like the last shadow.  I broke two lcds on that thing.  I am not hard on phones either.  Going out on the interwebs shows that i am not the only one that had those problems with the original.  Hopefully this one is better at connecting to WiFi too.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Najakwa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 15th 2009 1:21PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>