If the coverage sucks, why would you pay an ETF? Clearly, the carrier is obligated to provide service. If they advertise the "best" coverage, and do not provide it, how is it that people continue to pay full price for their service? And then pay an ETF when they are dissatisfied?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
250.00?
is verizon not aware the airave is 100 bucks?
if i have to pay 250 bucks for better coverage in a rural area why wouldnt i just switch and pay the 200 ETF?
sometimes i really wonder what crack are they smoking at verizon
If the coverage sucks, why would you pay an ETF? Clearly, the carrier is obligated to provide service. If they advertise the "best" coverage, and do not provide it, how is it that people continue to pay full price for their service? And then pay an ETF when they are dissatisfied?
i just dont understand how you can sell a customer the value of your product when its more than doubly expensive than your competitors
makes no sense...unless there is no monthly fee..which would also make no sense