If the coverage sucks, why would you pay an ETF? Clearly, the carrier is obligated to provide service. If they advertise the "best" coverage, and do not provide it, how is it that people continue to pay full price for their service? And then pay an ETF when they are dissatisfied?
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
If the coverage sucks, why would you pay an ETF? Clearly, the carrier is obligated to provide service. If they advertise the "best" coverage, and do not provide it, how is it that people continue to pay full price for their service? And then pay an ETF when they are dissatisfied?