Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm in the market for a new phone and money isn't a limitation. I'm also not partial to any particular US carrier, but here are some of the features I'd like to have: WiFi, GPS, good coverage in lots of places, push Gmail (a must!), physical keyboard (a must!), a touchscreen, decent battery life and a relatively slim body. And please, nothing that has a fruit logo on it. No offense to the fruit fans, though. Thanks!"
I would actually trust buying it more with a Cisco label on it than Samsung (which is what Sprint and Verizon use, according to the article). I know this is made by a third-party that Cisco owns (partly) but it still gives me confidence they put their name on it. Network hardware is still the bulk of their business and I can't see them wanting to tarnish their reputation by putting out junk.
Of course they bought Linksys for home/SOHO network hardware, but in my experience Linksys routers were mostly really good, so I would have bought a Linksys home router anyway. I sure wouldn't have bought a Samsung...