http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Engadget Mobile Podcast 006 - 01.28.2009 http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 28th 2009 1:34PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 28th 2009 2:09PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 28th 2009 2:40PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 28th 2009 6:44PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/
I'll give it another go. W/o Josh (who was in the 1st one, I believe) there just doesn't seem to be the same level of focus & too prone to digression. ]]>Jan 28th 2009 11:14PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/
Just kidding - thanks for the feedback. We'll try to tighten it up.]]>Jan 29th 2009 8:40PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 29th 2009 11:07AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/28/engadget-mobile-podcast-006-01-28-2009/Jan 29th 2009 11:56AM