<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[Um.. I'm not one to complain, but, This article is misleading. They really have nothing to do with the subsidized price. That all Verizon. I can guarantee that Rim is not selling the device for under the subsidized price. They have no razor blades to sell to justify selling under manufacturing cost. The only real fact is ..yeah they may not make as much per unit as the Iphone. big woop. its also not their only product like apple. So the could be making more per unit on a lot of the other phones. If I want sensationalism in my articles I'll go to TMZ.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James A]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 7:55AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm pretty sure that they mean it is less profitable for Verizon/Vodafone etc. Who are compelled by the market to sell this phone for less than it costs to make. They are still making millions of of the cell service, just losing a bit on the hardware.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bdenglish]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 10:30AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[What iSuppli _cannot_ account for are contractual discounts from vendors. To take their ballpark-estimation as gospel is simply foolish.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[backbeat]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 11:23AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on iSuppli: BlackBerry Storm costs $4 more than its purchase price to build]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/01/29/isuppli-blackberry-storm-costs-4-more-than-its-purchase-price/</guid><description><![CDATA[VZW to buy from a master dealer the storm costs 500 master dealer claims to only charge 5 dollers over what they paid there for verizon sells the phone to stores for 495. Same situation for the bold on att except masterdealer sells for 520 so that means att sells the bold to its stores for 515 ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john doe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 29th 2009 2:29PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>