<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for First Acer-branded smartphone a Glofiish DX900 rebadge?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/03/first-acer-branded-smartphone-a-glofiish-dx900-rebadge/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for First Acer-branded smartphone a Glofiish DX900 rebadge?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on First Acer-branded smartphone a Glofiish DX900 rebadge?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/03/first-acer-branded-smartphone-a-glofiish-dx900-rebadge/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/03/first-acer-branded-smartphone-a-glofiish-dx900-rebadge/</guid><description><![CDATA[How shallow: the rebranding of a phone that even originally was nothing more than the bad copy of the  (very) old HTC's touch.<br>HTC renewed its old design with new versions of it ( Touch viva, touch 3G , touch dual, etc) which are leaps and bounds better than this copy of their first version, so why should anyone buy this rebranding of a copy of a phone out of production since years?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 3rd 2009 11:26AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>