http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/ Engadget Comments for http://www.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://www.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:34PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:36PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
http://www.macrumors.com]]>Feb 12th 2009 4:58PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 5:24PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 5:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 5:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/"How much abuse can that a case like that take?"

Still poor grammar, dude.]]>Feb 13th 2009 9:37AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Yeah, I realized I made one more than mistake now. Thanks.

It's supposed to read as:

"How much abuse can a case like that take?"]]>Feb 16th 2009 2:29PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Fake.]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:43PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/I always appreciated the straight bricky lines of Apple products.
Curvy back of the 3G and plastic finish prevented me from upgrading. I am really happy with the overall form of the 2G iPhone.
If it ends up looking curvy, like the new Palm, they lost to me.]]>Feb 12th 2009 5:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Worst-case scenario: fake. Best-case scenario: pre production mock-up. I'd tend to go for the former.]]>Feb 13th 2009 1:03AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:45PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:44PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 6:39PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:47PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
And yes, it's fake.]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:46PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Typing "first" doesn't bog down your computer, or make the site load slower. It doesn't magically lock your eyes onto the word - rendering you incapable of skipping over the poster's "comment", nor is it offensive. Why go through the trouble of comment filtering for a relative few readers' fragile sensibilities?

Like gonintendo said, people would just come up with something different. Number 1!!!111, Inb4all, Top Dawg, Post #00001, Zuerst, d'abord, primo, primero, etc...]]>Feb 13th 2009 9:53AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
PALM PRE]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/☻☻☻☻☻]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:48PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:49PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:50PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:51PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Mine (first gen) looks like it has been to hell and back once or twice. No glossy plastic for me!]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:53PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:04PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
It was just an afterthought. I use my phone 7-9 hours a day. I need something with some durability. Having to give up the first gen at some point will be difficult. Just sayin'.]]>Feb 12th 2009 4:06PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
See that plastic in the hinge of your MacBook Pro? That's where the bulk of the Wi-Fi antennas are.]]>Feb 12th 2009 4:15PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Seriously, look.]]>Feb 12th 2009 10:01PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 13th 2009 7:59AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Sweet!]]>Feb 12th 2009 3:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 3:54PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
Is the photo clear enough for someone to run the serial number through the Apple warranty database? If it's registered, it's obviously fake. On my phone so image ain't clear.]]>Feb 12th 2009 4:00PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:55PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 13th 2009 8:16AMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:08PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:09PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:14PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:16PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:20PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:22PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/Feb 12th 2009 4:25PMhttp://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/http://www.engadget.com/2009/02/12/is-this-a-matte-black-iphone-answer-probably-not/
BTW, it's real.]]>Feb 12th 2009 4:29PM