<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[HOLY FUGLY, YOU'RE LOSEING IT ATT!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jdizzle]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2009 4:42PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[that moto is fat and ugly looks like it is a basic phone no phone factor to it.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[phonjunkie31]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2009 4:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[Is a Blackberry/Nokia Serie E, Some Samsung, and a Palm Pre XD! they avoid the iPhone Design, so weird these days]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[icchansan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2009 8:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[So I guess its safe to say Motorola will be laying off more people this year huh?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 13th 2009 10:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[You'll guess it rotates??????]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[stiltskin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 14th 2009 11:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Motorola's QA4, VE66LX, and QA1 dash onto the scene, rumor-style]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/13/motorolas-qa4-ve66lx-and-qa1-dash-onto-the-scene-rumor-style/</guid><description><![CDATA[i know i complained about att not having a dumbphone with a qwerty, but att, we can live without that moto......thing!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 15th 2009 6:11PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>