HTC says Touch Pro2 will be "broadly available," North America included

[Via Brighthand]
Read - HTC tweet I
Read - HTC tweet II


"Satisfied" iPhone 3GS owners
Of 200 iPhone 3GS users polled in August, 2009, 99 percent termed themselves "satisfied," with 82 percent saying they were "very satisfied."
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
This phone is a MUST-GET.
To be honest, this looks like an iPhone with an external keyboard, which many think Apple would release,
some sort of iPhone Pro or something.
Good for HTC to release it first, or else they would look like the copycats.
Except for the fact that it's running the same old bland WM OS... HTC makes great hardware but unfortunately it keeps getting hampered by a junk OS that just never seems to get any better. I'm sure this thing will run WM 6.5 (another temporary patch to calm the masses) but I think the 7.0 ground up rewrite WM OS is what will truly make a difference on great hardware such as this.
Carries over the same CPU chipset so same lag issues and under performance. Just a fresh-coat of paint to try to resell you on the same old dog.
Check out the Acer M900 which offers a slightly bigger screen without the Qualcomm problems.
ill wait for the N97, but this device looks like it might be fun to play with.
If this thing has a touch sensitive touchscreen, it will rock. If it has a pressure sensitive touchscreen, it will just be meh.
Multi-touch would be great, but it seems difficult to pry from Apple's hands.
How 'bout a headphone jack too?
If by that you mean a capacitive screen vs a resistive one, then it will be resistive because that's all WinMo supports.
I'm pretty sure WinMo can support capacitive.
http://discuss.pocketnow.com/showthread.php?threadid=23389
My definition of supporting "touch" would be the support recognizing touch without pressure, which a resistive screen is not. You can touch a resistive screen all you want, but unless you apply some level of pressure, it's not going to recognize it.
Ideally, we could have both, where you could touch the screen to navigate using a cursor and use pressure to perform a selection or "click," like what I've seen the Storm do in demos.
If I had a choice between capacitive or resistive, I would choose capacitive any day. Smoother navigation is more important to me than being able to take hand written notes on my device.
@bernardino: Your "touch" screen is what's called a capacitive touch screen, like the iPhone and the G1.
The Touch Pro is resistive (pressure-responsive), but you can set the pressure sensitivity to be pretty light, so it gets pretty close to feeling like a capacitive screen...except around the edges, sadly.
Note that HTC's website lists all their phones' screens as "touch-sensitive", yet we know the G1 is capacitive and the Touch Pro 1 is resistive.
I would say it's a safe bet that the Touch Pro 2 is resistive.
Touch sensitive screen - http://www.htc.com/www/product/touchpro2/product-tour.html
Have to say, I have been looking at an iPhone (ATT's network is the draw back) and a BB Storm, but since I am on Sprint I might have to wait until this and the Diamond 2 come along - though I doubt this will happen until Q3 at Sprint.
If you're on Sprint - wait for the Pre - way better phone all the way around.
@ haX0r: And... how long have you owned your Pre?
When will people stop jumping on the bandwagon for phones that haven't even been released yet? Look at the G1. As anticipated as it was, it turned out to be a major let down. Same with the Storm. People really need to just reserve judgment until they try these phones out for themselves.
I will be looking for the Pre, but I just have a feeling the display is not going to be big enough for me. I passed on the Touch Pro this past year due to that reason. And while the Pre's screen is a little bit bigger, it might still be smaller than I want. I had a Storm for a few weeks - the display is excellent. I return it b/c the call quality was not so good and VZW costs 40% more than my Sprint plan! I really like the looks of the Pro 2 - and that speaker phone. I suggest every one search for HTC Touch Pro 2 on YpuTube and watch some of the videos. Sweet features.
@ haXor
I disagree the only thing Pre has over this is is Web OS and maybe a better processor.
This beats the Pre in
1. Screen size
2. Screen resolution
3. Keyboard size
4. Expandable memory
Now if you take this Touch Pro 2 and put Web OS on it then you have a world beater
And you know webOS to be the end all mobile OS that's perfect with no problems?
Same reasons i havent gotten one of the 'top unique phones:' iPhone, G1, or soon to be released Pre: the screen resolution. Sure the iphone has a large screen but its only HVGA.. how underwhelming.. no wonder it has no issues with graphics.
This device though has a 3.6inch WVGA screen (read:insane) and a full qwerty. Im currently using the diamond but this device might convince me to go back to the slide out qwertys.
Any word on the BATTERY? Looks like the same 1500mAh?
That's my biggest gripe with the current Touch Pro. All these big-screen phones are great...for the 3/4 day that they last with active usage. If you have a phone that does almost everything...you're probably going to use it a lot, so it would be nice if it had more staying power.
Sure, Mugen and Seido make good extended batteries, and truthfully I don't mind the size and weight, but no one makes /cases/ for the super-sized versions.... :-(
And I think they took away the camera flash on the Touch Pro 2...bummer. Not crucial, but was nice to have.
I'll believe it when I see it because they might have to take the front cam away like they've been doing on all their 3G phones for North American market.
There's a reason why the front cameras are removed from North American models:
Our mobile phone network, unlike other countries and nations, does not support video calling. Period.
As close as you'll get here is AT&T's VideoShare, which unfortunately only works one way.
The US is extremely behind on mobile networks. Look at frickin' Canada even - THEY'VE got 2-way video calling.
Our networks do support Video Calling, but why put a strain on your network for a feature that isn't in demand. AT&T/T-Mobile could support true video calling (since W-CDMA supports simultaneous voice/data) and Sprint/Verizon could do Video and Voice-over-IP on their EVDO networks.
Same old boring, slow, laggy processor. Come on HTC. I want to ditch my iPhone since I miss the functionality of WinMo. But looks like I have to stick with the iphone for a couple more years.
Is it really the processor though? The iPhone has a slower processor/less RAM than the new HTCs but the UI is more fluid/responsive. I think the software is more to blame.
Any see the screenshot? I want to know how to do 5-way conferencing with my cell phone... Anyone know any more about this?