<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Specification sheet reveals quad-band 3G BlackBerry Bold for Japan</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Specification sheet reveals quad-band 3G BlackBerry Bold for Japan</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Specification sheet reveals quad-band 3G BlackBerry Bold for Japan]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</guid><description><![CDATA[NTT docomo says they're having some people says their Bold is heats up while charging. docomo says they've suspended sales and looking into the matter.<br>Is this a docomo-specific matter or a simple FAQ? Personally I think battery heatup is a commonplace issue in these small devices, and critical safety problems like popping defective battery are unlikely to be seen in a later model in production sold in a small country. so I guess docomo samurais are simply overreacting to what a kind of thing they had never seen, but I wanted it to be sure it's safe. <br><br><a href="http://translate.google.co.jp/translate?prev=hp&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nttdocomo.co.jp%2Finfo%2Fnotice%2Fpage%2F090227_00_m.html&sl=ja&tl=en&swap=1" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.co.jp/translate?prev=hp&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nttdocomo.co.jp%2Finfo%2Fnotice%2Fpage%2F090227_00_m.html&sl=ja&tl=en&swap=1</a>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[num0]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2009 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Specification sheet reveals quad-band 3G BlackBerry Bold for Japan]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</guid><description><![CDATA[word on the street was that Tmo passed on the Bold due to quality issues. you know, the same quality issues that kept AT&T from getting theirs out the door for months. Now we have this bit about Japanese models possibly overheating? For once I may have to give Tmo a pass for failing to get a competitive phone out on the market. now if only they could do something about that absolutely ancient Wing of theirs....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[henry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 27th 2009 4:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Specification sheet reveals quad-band 3G BlackBerry Bold for Japan]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/02/27/specification-sheet-reveals-quad-band-3g-blackberry-bold-for-jap/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sigh... 800MHz = 850MHz, so it's not a separate band.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jamar]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 28th 2009 7:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>