<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget - Comments for WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO</title>
<link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link>
<description>Engadget Comments for WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Mmh, that´s not the first video I saw of the Diamond II running Windows Mobile 6.5. And it´s by far not the best (and for those not understanding German even more although they´re not telling anything new and just added their audio comment to an existing video). I think this video (<a href="http://www.viddler.com/explore/engadget/videos/255/11.737" rel="nofollow">http://www.viddler.com/explore/engadget/videos/255/11.737</a>) (funny that engadget doesn´t know about their own videos ;-) ) is way better and understandable]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[xzam]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 9:26AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[I thought WinMo is ancient.  No?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 11:52AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[No.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[livingnightmare]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 4:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/MWC-2009-Live-Report-article-a_4037-p_14.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.phonearena.com/htmls/MWC-2009-Live-Report-article-a_4037-p_14.html</a><br><br>Phone Arena has had a video demonstration of the HTC Touch Diamond 2 running Winmo 6.5 since Feb. 15th.<br><br>And it's in English...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[plh2034]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[maybe WinMo 6.5 is just so good, HTC decided to forgo TouchFLO from now on? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA *gasp* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA<br><br><br>sorry.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[oakie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 10:46AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[That was just wack.  Whats with this windows mobile 5, 6, 6.1, 6.5???<br>Why cant they make one that is efficient,  user friendly, no glitches, no lag, and basically the FINAL product.  Look at Apple or Palm, they dont tease you with complete upgrades every year.  They make a product that just AMAZES you and WORKS...then minor upgrades as needed. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tsurek]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 7:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Without TouchFlo on there... it feels like WinMo 1.0]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[DssTrainer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 1st 2009 10:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on WinMo 6.5 running on a Touch Diamond2, sans TouchFLO]]></title><link>http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.engadget.com/2009/03/01/winmo-6-5-running-on-a-touch-diamond2-sans-touchflo/</guid><description><![CDATA[Microsoft's decision to take control of the UI with 6.5 onwards is going to lose them a few customers... there are many people who prefer the customizations companies do in 6.1.  I just don't understand their thinking, except maybe people must have complained that they get lost on all these different Windows UI's... blaming MS for something the manufacturer did.  Maybe.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kwikit]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 2nd 2009 12:53AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
