<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? </title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? ]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</guid><description><![CDATA[i just like the idea of SIM cards mainly when talking about CDMA companies going to LTE for 4G. my friends use AT&T and it just looks so convenient for him to be able to pick a phone in the morning, slide his card in and go (he buys a lot of phones). i think i read somewhere that Verizon may require phone manufacturers to make the SIM cards non-swappable (the consumer can't get to it inside the phone) so i'm hoping that if Sprint does drop WiMAXX they don't do the same.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[SoCoolCurt (PSN: KillaKornbread - XBL: SoCoolCurt)]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 9:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? ]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think this is a bad idea... but haven't Google, Sprint, Clearwire, and friends already dumped billions of dollars into wimax? I can't imagine these companies are just going to cut their losses and invest in their competitors technologies.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 10:57AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Sprint keeping its options open with LTE? ]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/10/sprint-keeping-its-options-open-with-lte/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't imagine that Sprint would actually be evaluating LTE as an alternative - this sounds more like a comment intended to emphasize the competitive stance Sprint/Clearwire.  Something to the effect of, "We're not blind - LTE is a competitive threat and we're going to learn all we can about it and it's weaknesses," rather than insinuating that they may be considering a WiMax/LTE combo or transitioning from WiMax to LTE.<br><br>Think of all the embedded capital still being depreciated.  A switch like this would be unfathomable for a company with free cash flow issues like Sprint.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Econ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 10th 2009 11:09AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>