http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/ Engadget Mobile Comments for Zer01 is the new, contract-less MVNO that will bring VOIP to the mobile masses http://mobile.engadget.com/media/feedlogo.gif http://mobile.engadget.com en-us Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only. Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/Can some tech people comment?]]>Mar 13th 2009 9:55AMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/
But, but but ... As much as I want to believe this, it does sound a little too good to be true. The beta should be in April though, and I'm trying my hardest to get in on it. Plus, you'd have to think the carriers will cut this off if they could - and I think they have no legal obligation to provide connection to a third party.

At the very least though, this could bring some prices down.]]>Mar 13th 2009 2:18PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/Mar 13th 2009 5:49PMhttp://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/13/zer01-is-the-new-contract-less-mvno-that-will-bring-voip-to-the/They have one advantage, they will be under the GSM network so consumers will be able to pick up their SIMs but again, if they can't get their name out in the industry, they will go no where.
I've spoken with a number of MVNO's who wanted to come out with unlimited international/domestic calls through a VOIP process. It's obviously possible but I'm certain there were glitches. ]]>Mar 20th 2009 9:33PM