<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[fffff, I blame at&t]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2009 7:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[and the people want this phone with all the capabilities of the unbranded E71. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Douglas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2009 9:24AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[the bug is probably stemming from at&t's crippling app's they put on everything but the iphone.  Amazing how unlocked nokia devices work perfectly fine, but the att branded phones do not.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[milan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2009 10:47AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[OH COME ON!<br>I was just on my way to the att store to pick this up today<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rohan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2009 12:51PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[As an owner of the current E71, I can't possibly see the advantage a branded version of this phone will have over the standard one... <br><br>Heck my data plan is half the price of the smartphones' (as I'm sure AT&T will label this, because it is) <br><br>Pay the $150 more, you'll make it back in 8 months and won't be in a contract. I swear, some people just don't care enough to be bothered with common sense...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe K.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 24th 2009 9:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on AT&amp;T pushing back Nokia E71x launch?]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/03/24/atandt-pushing-back-nokia-e71x-launch/</guid><description><![CDATA[Just stopped by an ATT store in DC...They said they are hoping to have the E71 in by "early April."  Not holding my breath.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 25th 2009 1:27PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>