<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</guid><description><![CDATA[while that does look like the glyde, i don't think it is.  on the glyde the "home" button is a boring matte button of the same color as the phone, not silver.  also, i think i see a forward facing camera in the top left there, which the piece of shit glyde doesn't have.  the form factor looks identical, obviously.<br><br>well, anything to help me get rid of this godforsaken phone.  the glyde is so bad its literally ruining my life!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a ham sandwich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2009 5:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</guid><description><![CDATA[damn. nevermind.  that phone does appear to be the F700.  i hadn't seen that before. apologies.<br><br>:(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[a ham sandwich]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2009 5:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</guid><description><![CDATA[No touchWIZ?<br>This can't come from Samsung.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[KilgoreTrout]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2009 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</guid><description><![CDATA[it says it will have touchwiz.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sofunnytom]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 7th 2009 10:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Samsung Louvre confirmed by second retailer]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/04/07/samsung-louvre-confirmed-by-second-retailer/</guid><description><![CDATA[will it use a sim card???]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jonBrazil]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 22nd 2009 6:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>