Because it doesnt work well at al and needed to be changed. if you fail at something make it again, and make it better until you stop failing. RIM failed, now they're trying not to fail.
There's nothing wrong with the surepress screen. The software that makes use of it sucks. People complained that pressing down on the screen while typing was annoying. So why not include a setting that can enable/disable it? The touch screen is still a touch screen and doesn't need the button to be pressed to click.
When I tried the surepress I thought it was really good along with all of my friends. I think it was also awarded one of the best new technology awards recently as well.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
The space between the screen looks like it would unable it to be pressed down. Kinda of odd if they really are not bringing surepress back
I totally agree with you. Why would RIM spend time and money on R&D of their "screen technology" and then can it a year later?
Because it doesnt work well at al and needed to be changed. if you fail at something make it again, and make it better until you stop failing. RIM failed, now they're trying not to fail.
There's nothing wrong with the surepress screen. The software that makes use of it sucks. People complained that pressing down on the screen while typing was annoying. So why not include a setting that can enable/disable it? The touch screen is still a touch screen and doesn't need the button to be pressed to click.
When I tried the surepress I thought it was really good along with all of my friends. I think it was also awarded one of the best new technology awards recently as well.