<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[They will have front facing cameras!?! Does this mean AT&T is launching video calling? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Piotr]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 7:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bleh. These phones are crippled by the old qualcomm 528mhz cpu. Expect woefully inadaquate performance. Don't waste your money.  Wait for the next line of CPUs; qualcomm 1ghz snapdragon, nVidia Tegra, or TI's quad core mobile.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ravicai]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 1:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[the TP2 looks fake, or AT&T screwed up the keyboard. the keys should be staggered.<br>I am also thinking of waiting to the snapdragon processors...]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[surly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 1:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[no att logo on those devices. they're probably just place holders.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[M]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 7:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[HTC Warhawk is said to have only 3,2-megapixel camera, but HTC Touch Diamond is equipped with 5-megapixel camera... Something strange. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[uletel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 7:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Thats how the unbranded HTC versions are, too.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Why did HTC opt for a weaker camera in the TP2? I was wondering that....it makes it less appealing]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bourne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Note the Home key instead of the Windows logo key.  I hope that that is just a stand-in because one of the requirements for WM6.5 is the Windows logo key.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[James Bond]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I like how after the repetitive attempts from the consumers to ask to NOT CHANGE THE KEYBOARD LAYOUT, they have completely redesigned the keyboard anyway... like. a COMPLETE redesign... what a waste.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[riverblue2004]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone Notice the "Z" and "Y" keys are in opposite places?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bourne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[That means it is a QWERTZ keyboard placeholder, which are common in German speaking countries. That phone is fuckin hot. I will definately be getting a TP2 with that beautiful red.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[This keyboard better be a prototype.  Otherwise the people for both AT&T and HTC that came to a consensus on going to manufacturing with this garish ruination of the perfection that is the stock Touch Pro2 keyboard, should be fired.  Nay they should be hung!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mobiquizoid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not sure I really like the Red/Burgundy...I'm still waiting to find out what ther HTC "Superstar" device will be aswell.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bourne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 8:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Not real.<br><br>QWERTZ keyboard.<br><br>American carrier.<br><br>Not real.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 10:06PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[This will make up for AT&T screwing us out of the Omnia. In fact, I think this will be a better phone than the Omnia.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[gch42]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 10:14PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Those pictures are from the really old mockup/prototypes that used to appear on people's really old planning documents.  Even tmob had that tp2 photo on their plans back in the day and it ended up being what it is today, so I wouldn't take those to mean much at all.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Soriin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 10:32PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Whenever they release it, I'm upgrading my Tilt.  I love the Tilt and this is more of a true next gen Tilt than the Fuze since HTC decided to ditch the "Tilt" feature.<br><br>I'm not really feeling the red keyboard though. Let's hope they decide to stick with black.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[HAZE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 24th 2009 10:55PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[If you read the accompanying sales sheet for the Touch Pro 2, you'll see it mentions a 5-row keyboard, like the unlocked HTC version. Also, if you remember the leaked HTC roadmap of devices, you'll remember the Rhodium (stock Touch Pro 2 codename) having a burgundy keyboard, while still retaining the staggered key layout. i'm guessing this custom layout is an early prototype design they tossed around before they went with the current design, and dropped the burgundy color for silver. <br><br>Of course, they list the Touch Diamond 2 as having a 3.2 megapixel camera, when the stock version has a 5 megapixel camera, so who knows?<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[aoi tsuki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 3:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wrong, wrong, wrong. This seems real fake to me or somehting produced months ago and meant for the shredder bu someonne resurrected it. How is it that a major company would put out so much inaccurate information like this so close to release? If this is official annnouncement, then shame on ATT to allow so many inaccuracies. Shame on them for messing up the HTC Touch Pro 2 keyboard rows and key arrangement. Shame on them for doing the same with the TD 2. I do recall a post on some website months ago showing all the HTC releases this year by arrier. The ATT vesion did look somehting like this and it was not the TP2 or TD 2 but some other model but it was not by the names Warhawks or Fortress. In war, this seems to be purposely misleading just to mess with the publoic and keep them guessing. But it makes ATT look pretty lame.<br> ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[AZ Hiker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 9:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[Did you notice that the HTC in your picture had a QWERTZ keyboard? Is this new?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ckillam3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 25th 2009 9:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[The HTC Diamond 2 running windows mobile 6.5 is an absolute homerun for microsoft windows mobile and HTC as well.  ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Layton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 4th 2009 2:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[do you think they will have an unlocked version of this phone and NOT look like the one in the prototype (if it is a fake one)? I know the orignial TP had an unlock version, do you think they would do the same with this one?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jules]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 11th 2009 12:08PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC's Warhawk and Fortress are AT&amp;T's Touch Diamond2 and Pro2]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/05/24/htcs-warhawk-and-fortress-are-atandts-touch-diamond2-and-pro2/</guid><description><![CDATA[They'll probably take the the user facing camera out, but I really hope AT&T will leave them in this time. Even if they think the network cant support video calling now, it will be able to at some point. Highways in the US cant handle everyone driving at 100mph, but that doesn't mean all the cars here are artificially capped at 70mph]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 14th 2009 12:44PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>