<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Yay more underperforming WinMo phones with pretentious codenames, keep em coming, HTC! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 3:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[so i take it you've used this phone and that's what you're basing your comment on? or maybe you already used winmo 6.5 on a snapdragon proc? or you used the 8mp camera already?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slamEVIL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 3:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am sure that is fake. The back part is just like the Max 4. Also if you see the screen in the bottom is not real, i will take a screen shot and i ll mark it to see it. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Antreas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[<a href="http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2689/12626002.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/2689/12626002.jpg</a><br>See it. Just zoom to see it clear that is not true <br><br>P.S Sorry for my bad english! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Antreas]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 4:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't get it, why is fake. I am not a HTC fan, just I don't get it.:(]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[$e@alblaighter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 9:01AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[It is a render, you can't use that kind of proof to say a render is fake.  It isn't an actual picture.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterF]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 9:21AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[8mPx camera without a flash ? Is that a joke ?<br><br>I vote Fake.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[smover]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 5:20AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well HTC don't want to put flash in their models, look at their newest models top see it! HTC is weak in camera quality!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[$e@alblaighter]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 9:05AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[ugly photoshop. nice try web scammarz.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[m.carroll]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 7:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[fake, 2009 htc phones have the zoombar, mainly because the newer version of the htc photoviewer software requires it aswell...<br><br>plus htc does not use the arrow logo on the newer phones... ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[inf3rno]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 8:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[it could be an old render]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slamEVIL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 3:21PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's fake... agreed!  It's not just the zoombar...Where's the Windows logo button?  Wasn't it suppose to be a Microsoft requirement on devices with Windows 6.5 and up?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Wayne]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 10:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[i believe i read somewhere that the windows flag could be in the form of a soft key.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[slamEVIL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 3:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[it looks like a HTC 4G back with a diamond 2 on the front. probably fake.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[l Squid l]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 10:59AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[FAKE... i cant believe that so many sites have that "news"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Niemand]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 4:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on HTC Firestone possibly rendered again, less blurry this time]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/06/23/is-this-the-htc-firestone/</guid><description><![CDATA[That is obviously fake.<br>It's a Fuze front where they photoshopped out the dpad and shrunk down the buttons.<br>And if it's shipping with 6.5 it has to have a Windows logo.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Guy #1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 23rd 2009 8:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>