<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Engadget Mobile - Comments for LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't</title>
<link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link>
<description>Engadget Mobile Comments for LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2009 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[cool]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ausesher]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2009 9:00PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[This looks pretty similar to the Dash 3G]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2009 9:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[It does. Just what any 12-year old kid without a sense of purpose or value would want. Other than that, it looks great! LoL]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[andonemorething]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2009 9:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's a nice looking phone. Functional, some design. Not overly complicated.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Anthony]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2009 11:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmmmmmm, this looks oddly like... a Blackberry?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Valicore]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 7th 2009 11:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[Keyboard looks like it came from the Motorola Q Global. Good for pre-teens.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[JayR]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 12:28AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[The bastard lovechild between a Sony Ericsson and a Motorola Q? No wonder LG sales surpassed the others. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jazen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 1:38AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can tell right now that this phone will end up at AT&T.<br>It has AT&T written all over its blueish white goodness. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sario]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 3:18AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the Smartphone for a 12 yr old lol]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Heavytoka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 8th 2009 12:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on LG's GW300 looks like a low-end WinMo phone, but isn't]]></title><link>http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://mobile.engadget.com/2009/07/07/lgs-gw300-looks-like-a-low-end-winmo-phone-but-isnt/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what the LG Neon should've been, atleast...it looks like that's what it should've been. <br>Maybe its just a personal thing. Overall, cute phone though. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Future]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 9th 2009 9:34AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>