Is this the Samsung Galaxy 2?
By Chris Ziegler 
posted January 28th 2010 2:24PM
posted January 28th 2010 2:24PM
You could accuse Samsung's first production Android device, the Galaxy, of many things -- but you couldn't really accuse it of being pretty. Maybe that's about to change with the phone's replacement, though, now that Androphones has scored a render of a device that appears to be an Android-powered Sammy that's looking a lot more put-together than anything they've released so far. Even better, it apparently has the chops to live up to its pretty face with a 1GHz Snapdragon, 3.7-inch AMOLED display, 5 megapixel cam, Android 2.1, and a whopping 32GB of internal storage on its way to an alleged MWC unveil, but we see one problem here: Samsung makes its own systems-on-chip, so we don't see why they'd be sourcing a Snapdragon here. That said, the picture looks real enough -- and you don't see rabid Samsung fans make convincing fake renders too often -- so we'll hold out hope this gets announced one way or another.
Is the headphone jack on the side, above the volume rocker?
@mondeca
Is the headphone jack on the side, above the volume rocker?
@mondeca
nope. its a speed hole. it makes it go faster
in other words, its a Passion copy.
the screen is 4 inches nit 3.7 inches as eldar murtazin said 2 month ago.
Samsung never buy snapdragon from Qualcomm. it uses it`s own SOC ,,,
YES , We`ll see Hummingbird in the heart of this magical phone... this is a real superphone .........
سامسونگ Galaxy2
http://www.handheldusers.com/forum/t4557.html
going hard with android 2.x
someone just p-shop'd a nexus screen onto this thing...
Is this really real?
That does NOT look like a 3.7 inch screen, much less 4.
The bezel on the bottom is HUGE.
That's 3.2 or 3.5 at best.
@Johnny Rockets I agree. Though it is sexy.
32gb on board means no 512 or 256meg limitation of app installs?
@pachi72 Good Question, I didn't even think about that! hmmm... I wonder also...
Don't digg Sammys
no physical keyboard, no thank you
Samsung still has 2nd/3rd class graphics in there behind PowerVR, Qualcomm, and vaporware Nvidia, so using their own SoC means this thing is going to under-perform. At least they do put out SDKs.
The spec looks fantastic apart from the camera, what is wrong with Samsung they use fantastic new technology like amoled screens but still insists on using 5 megapixel cameras, I have had the i900 & i8000 and the photos inside or in low light are rubbish & blur easily, will they please use at least 6 megapixel & please will Samsung please put a xenon flash on a Smartphone PLEASE.
After the way they abandoned the first Galaxy they will have a hard time finding anyone willing to buy it.