T-MOBILE USA REPORTS SECOND QUARTER 2010 RESULTS
$4.70 billion service revenues in the second quarter of 2010, an increase from $4.63 billion in the first quarter of 2010, but down from $4.77 billion in the second quarter of 2009
Blended data ARPU of $11.60 in the second quarter of 2010, up from $10.90 in the first quarter of 2010, and $9.90 in the second quarter of 2009
6.5 million customers using 3G-capable smart phones as of the second quarter of 2010, a 25% increase from the first quarter of 2010
T-Mobile USA's national 3G network covers 208 million people and the HSPA+ network upgrade now covers 85 million people delivering 4G speeds (as defined in Note 11 to the Selected Data below), including service in New York, Seattle, Los Angeles and Las Vegas
OIBDA of $1.42 billion in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $1.39 billion in the first quarter of 2010, but lower than $1.60 billion in the second quarter of 2009
Total customers served declined by 93,000 in the second quarter of 2010, compared to 77,000 net customer losses in the first quarter of 2010, and 325,000 net customer additions in the second quarter of 2009
BELLEVUE, Wash., August 5, 2010 -- T-Mobile USA, Inc. ("T-Mobile USA") today reported second quarter of 2010 results. In the second quarter of 2010, T-Mobile USA reported service revenues of $4.70 billion up from $4.63 billion in the first quarter of 2010, and OIBDA of $1.42 billion compared to $1.39 billion reported in the first quarter of 2010. Total customers served declined by 93,000 in the second quarter of 2010 compared to 77,000 net customer losses in the first quarter of 2010, but with positive net traditional postpay customer additions which are included within contract customers. Additionally, customers using 3G-capable smart phones continued to increase significantly during the quarter, driving blended data ARPU growth.
"In the second quarter of 2010, customers embraced T-Mobile USA's industry leading value which makes it simple and affordable for consumers to trade-up to next generation products and services," said Robert Dotson, President and CEO, T-Mobile, USA. "The number of 3G smartphones in the hands of our customers year-over-year has tripled to 6.5 million supported by a network that offers the broadest reach of 4G speeds in the U.S. as our growth continues through data revenues."
René Obermann, Chief Executive Officer, Deutsche Telekom, said, "T-Mobile USA soundly delivered on its aggressive HSPA+ network build out and roadmap execution in the second quarter; together playing a large role in driving strong data ARPU, as well as achieving contract customer growth and improved service revenue trends."
Customers
T-Mobile USA served 33.6 million customers (as defined in Note 3 to the Selected Data, below) at the end of the second quarter of 2010, down from 33.7 million at the end of the first quarter of 2010 and up from 33.5 million at the end of the second quarter of 2009.
In the second quarter of 2010, total customers served declined by 93,000, compared to a net decline of 77,000 in the first quarter of 2010 and net customer additions of 325,000 in the second quarter of 2009.
Sequentially and year-on-year, the number of net new customer additions decreased due primarily to fewer net prepaid customer additions.
Contract net customer additions were 106,000 in the second quarter of 2010, compared to 118,000 net contract customer losses in the first quarter of 2010, and 56,000 net contract customer additions in the second quarter of 2009.
Sequentially and year-on-year, the increase in net contract customer additions was driven primarily by improvements in net traditional postpay customer additions, which were positive in the second quarter of 2010 and benefitted from a variety of incentive offers.
Connected device customers, included within contract customers (as defined in Note 3 to the Selected Data, below), totaled 1.5 million at June 30, 2010 and continued to grow significantly during the second quarter of 2010.
Prepaid net customer losses, including MVNO customers (as defined in Note 3 to the Selected Data, below), were 199,000 in the second quarter of 2010, compared to 41,000 net prepaid customer additions in the first quarter of 2010 and 268,000 net prepaid customer additions in the second quarter of 2009.
In the second quarter of 2010, lower MVNO net customer additions were the primary reason for the year-over-year decrease in prepaid net customer additions. MVNO customers totaled 2.1 million at June 30, 2010.
Sequentially, prepaid net customer additions declined in the second quarter of 2010 due primarily to higher prepaid churn as discussed below.
Churn
Blended churn (as defined in Note 2 to the Selected Data, below), including both contract and prepaid customers, was 3.4% in the second quarter of 2010, up from 3.1% in the first quarter of 2010 and the second quarter of 2009.
Contract churn was 2.2% in the second quarter of 2010, in line with the first quarter of 2010 and second quarter of 2009.
Prepaid churn increased in the second quarter of 2010 to 7.6% from 6.8% in the first quarter of 2010 and 7.0% in the second quarter of 2009.
The sequential increase in prepaid churn was due primarily to competitive intensity impacting traditional prepaid and MVNO customers.
OIBDA and Net Income
T-Mobile USA reported OIBDA (as defined in Note 6 to the Selected Data, below) of $1.42 billion in the second quarter of 2010, up slightly from $1.39 billion in the first quarter of 2010 but down from $1.60 billion in the second quarter of 2009.
Sequentially, higher service revenues (discussed below) were partially offset by a higher equipment subsidy loss driven in part by a variety of incentive offers and as customers adopt more costly 3G-enabled smart phones.
Compared to the second quarter of 2009, OIBDA decreased due to lower service revenues from fewer branded customers and a higher equipment subsidy loss.
OIBDA margin (as defined in Note 7 to the Selected Data, below) was 30% in the second quarter of 2010, consistent with the first quarter of 2010 but down from 34% in the second quarter of 2009.
Net income in the second quarter of 2010 was $404 million, compared to $362 million in the first quarter of 2010 and $425 million in the second quarter of 2009.
Revenue
Service revenues (as defined in Note 1 to the Selected Data, below) were $4.70 billion in the second quarter of 2010, up slightly from $4.63 billion in the first quarter of 2010, but down 1.4% from $4.77 billion in the second quarter of 2009.
The sequential increase in service revenues was due primarily to data revenue growth, driven by the adoption of 3G data revenue plans and higher roaming revenues, partially offset by lower voice revenues.
Year-on-year, service revenues declined due primarily to fewer branded customers. However, the -1.4% rate of decline year-on-year in the second quarter of 2010 was an improvement from -3.0% year-on-year in the first quarter of 2010.
Total revenues, including service, equipment, and other revenues were $5.36 billion in the second quarter of 2010, up from $5.28 billion in the first quarter of 2010 and $5.34 billion in the second quarter of 2009.
Compared to the first quarter of 2010, the increase in total revenues was driven primarily by higher service revenues as described above.
Compared to the second quarter of 2009, the increase in total revenues was due primarily to higher equipment sales as customers adopt 3G-capable smart phones, which was partially offset by lower service revenues as described above.
ARPU
Blended Average Revenue Per User ("ARPU" as defined in Note 1 to the Selected Data, below) was $47 in the second quarter of 2010, up from $46 in the first quarter of 2010 but down from $48 in the second quarter of 2009.
Blended ARPU increased sequentially for the first time since the second quarter of 2008 driven by contract ARPU growth.
Contract ARPU was $52 in the second quarter of 2010, up slightly from $51 in the first quarter of 2010, and consistent with the second quarter of 2009.
The sequential increase in contract ARPU was driven by data revenue growth, partially offset by lower voice revenues.
Prepaid ARPU was $18 in the second quarter of 2010, consistent with the first quarter of 2010 but down from $21 in the second quarter of 2009.
The decrease compared to the second quarter of 2009 was due primarily to proportionally fewer FlexPaySM no-contract customers and a higher proportion of lower ARPU MVNO customers.
Data service revenues (as defined in Notes 1 and 9 to the Selected Data, below) were $1.17 billion in the second quarter of 2010, up 18% from the second quarter of 2009. Data service revenues in the second quarter of 2010 represented 25.0% of blended ARPU, or $11.60 per customer, up from 23.8% of blended ARPU, or $10.90 per customer in the first quarter of 2010, and 20.8% of blended ARPU, or $9.90 per customer in the second quarter of 2009.
6.5 million customers were using 3G-capable smart phones (such as the T-Mobile® MyTouchTM 3G Slide, HTC HD2 and BlackBerry® BoldTM 9700) on the T-Mobile USA network at the end of the second quarter of 2010, an increase of 25% from 5.2 million customers as of the first quarter of 2010 and more than tripling from 2.1 million customers as of the second quarter of 2009. 3G-capable smart phone customers now account for 19% of total customers, up from 15% in the first quarter of 2010 and 6% in second quarter of 2009.
The increase in customers using 3G-capable smart phones and the continued expansion of the upgrade of the 3G network are driving Internet access revenue growth with the increasing adoption of 3G data plans. Additionally, messaging continues to be a significant component of blended data ARPU.
CPGA and CCPU
The average cost of acquiring a customer, Cost Per Gross Add ("CPGA" as defined in Note 5 to the Selected Data, below) was $330 in the second quarter of 2010, up from $310 in the first quarter of 2010 and $270 in the second quarter of 2009.
Sequentially and year-on-year, CPGA increased in the second quarter of 2010 due primarily to a higher subsidy loss as T-Mobile USA offered a variety of incentives and as customers move towards purchasing more costly 3G-capable smart phones.
The average cash cost of serving customers, Cash Cost Per User ("CCPU" as defined in Note 4 to the Selected Data, below), was $23 per customer per month in the second quarter of 2010, consistent with the first quarter of 2010 and second quarter of 2009.
Sequentially and year-on-year, CCPU was consistent as a higher handset subsidy loss from a greater number of customers upgrading to more expensive 3G-capable smart phones was offset by lower network costs.
Capital Expenditures
Cash capital expenditures (as defined in Note 8 to the Selected Data, below) were $682 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared to $666 million in the first quarter of 2010 and $1.08 billion in the second quarter of 2009.
Year-on-year the decrease in capital expenditures was due primarily to higher network expenditures in the second quarter of 2009 as a result of the aggressive build out of the national UMTS/HSPA (3G) network in 2009, which covers 208 million people as of the end of the second quarter of 2010.
The upgrade to high speed packet access plus (HSPA+) technology, which delivers customers 4G data speeds (as defined in Note 11 to the Selected Data, below), now covers 85 million people, in markets such as New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, Washington D.C. and Las Vegas.
Stick Together Highlights
During the second quarter of 2010, Robert Dotson, president and chief executive officer of T-Mobile USA, announced his intent to transition to new opportunities in 2011 after 15 years of service with the company. In order to ensure a smooth transition of leadership, Dotson has committed to stay actively engaged in the business until May 2011. His designated successor is Philipp Humm, an experienced DT executive and former CEO of T-Mobile Germany. Humm was last responsible for sales and service in Europe as chief regional officer (CRO) Europe. After a period of transition with Dotson, Humm will take over as CEO of T-Mobile USA in February 2011, while Dotson will remain on as a non-executive board member until May 2011.
T-Mobile now offers 4G speeds (as defined in Note 11 to the Selected Data, below) to more people than any other network in the country reaching nearly 50 major metropolitan areas across the country. T-Mobile is on track to deliver HSPA+ speeds in 100 major metropolitan areas, covering 185 million people in the U.S. by the end of this year. Complementing the network expansion is a wider availability of the webConnectTM Rocket USB Laptop Stick and the Dell InspironTM Mini 10. Additionally later this summer, T-Mobile will unveil its first HSPA+ capable smart phone.
On June 19, 2010, T-Mobile USA celebrated Father's Day with an unprecedented industry-first promotion that offered a free cell phone to new contract family plan customers, including customers adding a line to an existing family plan.
On July 29, 2010, T-Mobile USA received the highest ranking among national wireless carriers in the J.D. Power and Associates 2010 Wireless Customer Care Performance StudySM - Volume 2. The award further reflects T-Mobile's commitment to providing an outstanding customer experience, whether in-store, online or on the phone.
T-Mobile USA is the U.S. wireless operation of Deutsche Telekom AG (OTCQX: DTEGY). In order to provide comparability with the results of other US wireless carriers, all financial amounts are in US dollars and are based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). T-Mobile USA results are included in the consolidated results of Deutsche Telekom, but differ from the information contained herein as Deutsche Telekom reports financial results in Euros and in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
This press release includes non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the information provided in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliations from the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided below following Selected Data and the financial statements.
CDMA/GSM/WiMAX/LTE HYBRID SUPER PHONES!!! Yeah let's get on that shit. Despite the inevitable horrific battery life from switching radios.
Here we come Samsung Epic 4G!
coverage, coverage, coverage. I work in the heart of Chicago and have no signal in the lower level area where AT&T has 2-3 bars. T-Mobile's GSM frequencies are inferior to AT&T's as far as penetrating buildings and other structures.
Unless T-Mo upgrades or give better and wider coverage then they are doomed to fail. I was with T-Mo for 7 years but had to switch since there's no service available for me (makes sense right?). My whole family of 5 phones switching with me.
I would like to see a graham cracker phone.
Dear T-Mobile, get that iPhone, and fast, and I won't leave.
@MBN
Unlike other phone manufactures, Apple decides who gets the iPhone. Despite being fully capable of adding AWS/1700 to the iPhone, they decided not to, I assure you T-Mobile would have wanted this.
I think a sprint/t mobile merger with a migration to LTE would be a heavenly match. Keep t mobiles customer service, sprints plans and undercut verizon/att slightly and there would be a marvelous cell company.
What is scary.....Is that A merger would bring over 80 Million Subscribers...the real kicker....is that WiMax/LTE chips exist TODAY.
I like T-mobile, have been with them for years and have had few reception issues (at least no more than anyone else I know with other carriers). However, I'm about to upgrade from a dumbphone to a smartphone and Tmo's offerings aren't very good. The 3g Slide is underpowered, unattractive and has a crappy UI. The Vibrant has reception and GPS issues and feels like it is going fall out of one's hands with its slippery feel. Oh, and no flash. I'm on the verge of leaving, the droid 2 and the Epic 4g look pretty tempting. However, Tmo keeps hinting at a new smartphone, they need to go ahead and release it already to sway me from the other two. So, Tmo get on that. Or do as the other chap said and get the iPhone (without craptastic service prices).
If there is a merger, I hope it is handled better than the way Sprint management handled the "merger" with Nextel. Sprint has TOTALLY RUINED everything that was good about Nextel. So, if Sprint merges with T-Mobile, I hope T-Mobile management ends up running the company, because Sprint management...in a word...SUCKS!
@emaildejan Dude sprints management team today is way different from the management team it had post nextel merger, way different as in not the same freaking people lol think before you type
@ LaWd MoUf
Trust me...as a long-time Nextel user, I KNOW exactly what management is running Sprint at all times since the merger. Dan Hesse still has done NOTHING to improve things on the iDEN side. Does iDEN have a larger footprint now compared to 2004 when it originally merged? No. Does it have a better, more modern phone selection? No (though I'm sure some would argue that the new Motorola i1 is a big step in the right direction). Does Sprint support Q-chat? Nope, not any more. So what benefit has Sprint provided us Nextel folks? Cheaper plans with infinitely WORSE service? That, to me, equates to the idea that Nextel would have been far better off having never entered into the merger at all.
If anyone needs to get their facts straight, it appears it would be you. Now, please go and play in your sandbox.
@emaildejan nextel was doomed from the beginning, with a dying platform, why you think nextel was happy to sell to the first taker? Trust me as a former nextel customer, their phones were always sub par compared to even sprints phones at the time, plus how you gonna blame sprint for a sucky platform that they don't even own or control, motorola owns iden, if sprint never bought nextel it would have gone to hell anyway, so the only mistake that sprint made was buying a technology slash network that was screwed up and dying in the first place, and the real idiot behind that is gary foresee not dan hesse, face it iden is not upgradeable period. And sprint tried to make the best it could out of a bad situation, q chat, hybrid, etc, so get your facts straight home boy lol
Well I guess to each is own for I am typing from a MyTouch 3G Slide I find it the total opposite. It is very fast and reliable and runs ranks with the "superphones" in terms of performance. It has faster web surfing because of the network and the battery last long. The screen has low resolution compared to the latest, but it is still sharp and vivid. It's a good investment. But if you must go, the droid incredible is just right.
T-Mobile has the best rate plans, best quality of voice sound on calls, and their customer service is the best in the industry; you never even have to speak to anyone in India about your rate plan or technical support. With that said, their coverage has holes like swiss cheese, so if they cover where you go most, nobody is better, but if they don't, oh well, get a 2nd carrier.
Don't worry TMo .. I'm not going anywhere...
So what's up with Emerald...
@LaWd MoUf
Again, you're mistaken. There is a 3G upgrade for iDEN. Don't believe me? Then look at NII Holdings (formerly named Nextel International) and what the heck they are doing, since they are upgrading the iDEN data side to HSPA+ in Peru and Brazil.
Your claims that Nextel was doomed is way off. Name for me some other carrier service aside from Nextel and T-Mobile that has a multi-country footprint? Verizon? No, that's just Vodaphone. AT&T? Nope, but at least they do use GSM. Sprint? Be real!
Furthermore, check on history. Where did Sprint get all of that 2.5Ghz spectrum that they gifted to Clearwire to use as they please? Where did Sprint get the 1.9Ghz spectrum to expand their CDMA capacity? Simply put, Sprint management (both under Gary Forsee as well as now under Dan Hesse) is clueless and should NOT be allowed to run any company. Both C-level execs have no vision and no ability to lead despite fanboys and investment firms claiming otherwise. There is a reason this company has lost over 5M subscribers under Dan Hesse. Those losses were from his ignorance of iDEN, and that's DESPITE his stating that he was going to "reinvigorate the Nextel brand." Really? What has he (or anyone at Sprint) done to "reinvigorate" Nextel?
History tells no lies...read up on the history of Nextel, and then compare that to Sprint, and to that of SprintNextel today, and you'll quickly realize how inept Sprint management (both then and now) actually are.
@emaildejan
Two questions
1. Iden is currently bleeding subs, do you have any ideas on how to make it have positive subs again?
2. If sprint is able to do the question above, would iDEN users be satisfied with a move to qChat or something in the likes of PTT on WiMax or LTE?, since cdma is also going to count has legacy technology one day.
@Xcharles718
In fact, I do.
1. In order to acquire new post-paid subs, Sprint should do simply 3 basic things:
A: Actually advertise Nextel as a true brand (it has yet to do so since the merger.
B: Revamp the pre-paid Boost and post-paid Nextel rate plans. There is no reason pre-paid should EVER enjoy better rate plans than post-paid users. So, I would offer post-paid Nextel folks a $60 Everything plan right out.
C: Since Sprint CDMA has the HTC Evo 4G (and soon the Samsung Epic 4G), and since Android works with Nextel iDEN, then petition Motorola to actually launch their iDEN/WiMAX "Harmony" lineup (which has been collecting dust for the past 5 years thanks to Sprint).
If those 3 things do not improve the post-paid status of Nextel iDEN, then I will eat my words.
2. I don't think iDEN folks really have any major quibble over what the underlying technology is, just so long as it works. The SERIOUSLY major problem is the inability for PTT phones (other than iDEN) to roam internationally and allow the user to use PTT. Take any Sprint Q-chat phone and it won't work outside of the US. That is a MAJOR drawback.
But, let's say that for whatever reason, NII Holdings and Telus Mobile both agree to forgo LTE and instead opt for WiMAX (or Sprint gives up on WiMAX and goes LTE instead), and PTT can work internationally, then I don't see any migration problem at all, and I would expect to see major net additions.
After all, iDEN is not inherently the problem. If it was, then NII Holdings would be reporting net losses. Even this past quarter, it's net additions were ABOVE EXPECTATIONS (they added nearly 400K post-paid net subs). So, it's in the 3 things: advertising, handsets, and rate plans. Those 3 things have been done fairly decently on the Sprint CDMA side, but the company has ignored the iDEN side entirely.
If Mr. Hesse did the above in any sincere way, AND it failed, then I wouldn't ask him to do any more with iDEN. But he (and the company at large) has not bothered to "reinvigorate" Nextel in any way. And that's why this company (and especially its management team) sucks.
With the economy supposedly down, I doubt T-Mobile is losing their customers that use data. If you're only interested in calls and texting, I could see people leaving, but it isn't for better gadgets on other networks.
I switched to T-Mobile away from Verizon three years ago because of 1) the high price of the service and phones, 2) the phone lock downs, and 3) the ridiculously high price of data plans. I commute 35 miles, one way, and drive all over L.A. and Orange county (California), and just don't have significant problems with coverage.
I thought of switching back 1 year ago for the Droid, but I did the math in the VZ store and I would have shelled out $75 more every month. My recent re-up with T-Mobile netted me 2 My-Touch Slides for $169.
T-Mobile customer here, about to get out of the contract I got with my G1 and move in with some sweet Epicness. Assuming they don't have GPS issues, that is.
i think sprint has the best data features than any other carrier but not the best service!..i like to watch movies on my phone but have to convert the files first with http://pocketdvd.weebly.com/
but i love my t mobile phone!!