Sure..I can admit it and even apologize for it. Sorry man. Wanna hug as well, lol?

@DavKarimz You are so gonna get tore up for those statements, considering all of which you said is wrong except for the spelling part.

Umm...I hope your tipsters triple checked their facts cause as far as I'm aware, that $100 limit ONLY applies to medianet on a PPU (pay per use) basis .ie: Browsing from your phone over WAP.

I'm still not sold on this device yet, I dunno..it's just the whole touch screen I guess...btw, source your info right engadget, source actually came from http://forums.crackberry.com/f86/thing-heavyy-only-dummy-pics-77263/ don't get it twisted even BlackBerryNews corrected themselves on that one :P

You do realize it was taken on an 8130 shooting a PC screen don't you?..It's from the internal video that was sent to VZW employee's earlier today go read the exif data off the pics posted from their source on crackberry.

Awww captured in all it's glory on an 8130 in front of a PC, yet no one has been able to leak the video from which the pics were taken from..in any even the device is a must "try before you buy" in my books!

Rogers has done a fine job of screwing up the launch anyways, and their price point is just nuts at the moment for the Bold and @Cassini, the touchscreen berry should fix your issues when it launches, but that'll be a CDMA exclusive for a bit

@Riley Freeman And go where for good phones and good coverage? Bell/Aliant..hmm nope can't even go outside my city and get their coverage...Telus...nope..same deal, and of course don't get me started on their phones...being a BlackBerry user, what options do I have...8830,8130,8330..which if you ask any RIM tech support agent are the WORST devices BlackBerry has ever made..the CDMA counterparts to the GSM versions blow!!

You do realize this article is a "half truth" right?

MediaSync was pulled because it was never meant to be released for general availability yet, the files that everyone were downloading only came about due to the fact that someone had a beta copy and "sniffed" the packets of what server the updates were coming from and then found the full application on those servers..posted it and voila, another leak in RIM's system, like we haven't seen enough of those in the recent months, everything from BETA OS files, to new applications, to TONS of device pictures and carrier slides.

Theirs nothing to indicate RIM had pulled this from being an available item later, they just pulled it from the server in the meantime to avoid people from downloading the application before it was even supposed to be available.

Soooo..whats stopping at&t from purchasing a few of these under a fake reseller name and then using the application and sniffing out where it actually connects to then implementing a block on the IP address for the connection?