| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Engadget | 11 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 2 Comments |
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
Sony designers admitted the idea itself is in the market more than 20 years. They R&D the idea long time but couldn't make product because they had to make balance between comfortability and sound quality.
As you mentioned, AKG K1000 produces superb sound, but it's heavy and not comfortable to wear. The problem is, to produce good base, speakers need to be big, just like K1000. Of course, die hard audiophiles don't care, but SONY is targeting much wider users and it was not acceptable size and weight.
Things changed recently. They realized new materials and duct design can reduce the speaker size, and carefully located speaker can control reflective sound more precisely.
(you can read designers interview here
http://www.sony.jp/topics/headphone/pfr-v1/index.html
it's Japanese article though)
I have one and I can say it's crystal clear sound and surprisingly comfortable. Some says base is weak. That might be true since most geeks here love canal type inner headphone like Etymotic or Shure, or full cover headset.
But we have to understand they're totally different systems and unfortunately, we can't get everything. Canal headphone tends to exaggerate base and sacrifice accuracy, full cover headphone produce most accurate sounds but generally it's heavy, open ear headphone can't produce as much base as others but can render accurate, speaker like sounds and can be very comfortable.
it's all matter of balance but I think Sony did good job here.