| Blog | # of Comments |
|---|---|
| Engadget | 4 Comments |
| Joystiq Playstation | 2 Comments |
| Engadget Mobile | 1 Comment |
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
What kind of technology does the PS3 have that the 360 can not mimick. Is there some sort of unheard of technology in there, maybe ps3 doesn't use chips or something? enlighten me please.
Shading? processing? lets see:
360 has superior shaders and ps3 supposedly (I say supposedly because we have not seen a game that handles more processes on ps3 than the 360 can handle yet) has a superior processor.
As far as programming technology is concerned which one do you think is the easier and stronger programming platform? here is a hint it aint the PS3.
I'm not saying the ps3 sucks, I'm just putting you in line and letting you know that if you are going to talk about programming, about what can or can't be done in a programming language then you should know your subject matter. At this moment nothing on ps3 can not be ported to 360. Afterall both machines are from Earth and made by men. So until Sony hires aliens to build their gaming consoles I will place bets that any other system with close benchmarks can match anything that can be made on the PS3.
Facts are facts: PS3 supposedly has a stronger processor but we haven't been able to see that due to how tough it is to program for it. Even after taking into account the stronger processor do not be fooled into thinking that it is leaps and bounds faster or more efficient than whats available on the competition. It might be a step ahead but it isn't ultimate SUPERIORITY.
I mean come on, Xbox had a better processor and video card than PS2 and look how similar games looked.