Prospective buyers will have to hope that phlegm and key resistant paint is an option.

@monkeypox
ATI is NOT doing a good job of making their GPUs more efficient right now.
If you compare nv and ATIs flagship cards (the GTX295 and the 4870x2), the ATI card consumes far more power and generates much more heat than the nvidia one (and generally for slightly less performance). ATI seems to be taking the route Intel took with the P4 ("crank up the frequencies, to hell with the increased power consumption and heat!") at the moment.

You missed the dash.
GT-R.
Now THAT is being pedantic...

"Progressive Activity Sedan" or, as we in the UK would call it, a five-door hatchback...

Er... the parts that make cars " go faster, stop shorter, or turn better" are precisely what they're talking about banning. In particular, tyres, it would seem, the element which allows you to "turn better". A performance tyre is one of the simplest, but most effective modifications you can make. This will not be an option in Oregon if the bill is passed, as softer compound 'sports' tyres have a greater rolling resistance than other less performance oriented tyres on the market. Presumably the bill also refers to engine modifications, which (last time I checked) usually make a car "go faster," in your words. I'm sure they'll ban fancy brake pads too, due to the materials they're made from, so that covers the "stop shorter" element.

Sorry for double posting, but do you mean you don't have to hide it under your desk, or do you mean you wouldn't be able to hide it under your desk?

Sometimes, I really hope people are being sarcastic. This is one of those moments.

Absolutely! Maybe Lian-Li should cut out the middleman and just stick the neon lights in there to begin with?

"Lian-Li don't make ugly cases. Utilitarian maybe, but not ugly."

Er... http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/23/lian-lis-pc-888-if-the-burj-al-arab-were-a-pc-chassis/

Why would anyone want that eyesore in their home? That's if it fits inside anyone's home...