This article was a waste. I gave the benefit of the doubt by migrating to the link in order to find what the fuss was all about, but after viewing the commercial, it's not that big a deal that AT&T (not Microsoft, mind you!), did only a slightly poor job of marketing, but nothing that bad bringing about this over-criticism. Nilay is not a douche, just a little over-exposed to Microsoft's poor development of its mobile products. This article was highly uncalled for and continues to do nothing more for these blog sites but increase traffic.

That's why webOS v1.2 has not been released yet. They need to counter the sync before they leave Pre users lampooned. How about this Palm? Make your own f*cking media sync application. BlackBerry did it. Windows Mobile kind does it but won't sync AAC/AAC+. I REALLY don't care if Nokia does it or not, but Palm, come on already.

Beautiful photoshop job ... hell of a prank to start the next round of speculative journalism that plagues each of these tech sites. Good grief ... get a life. It'd be nice for one of you sites to actually write about REAL things instead of rumors. Rumors are like porn for people that can't get the real thing. And to write about the "porn" is even less admirable. Get off the teet of the rumor mill and get on the circuitry of providing USEFUL information.

My concern is whether the screen resistive or capacitive ... it doesn't say anywhere in this well written article (sarcasm)

I've been testing this application from it's infancy ... it still sucks. By the way, I have in print from Torch that their browser piggy backs from some of IE mobile's stack ... this is the reason for the slowness. Write them to confirm this. I sh*t you not. This browser is not only non-self sufficient, it is basically IE Mobile wrapped in Webkit. Not a good strategy for developing a "better" browsing experience.

"one of the components can't be found".

I have a Sprint HTC Touch with WM6 (stock, unhacked), but Iris will not work ... any ideas? Please hit reply ...thanks