Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide Droid review Palm Pixi Review Bold 9700
  • James VanDerbeek
  • Member Since Sep 10th, 2008
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Engadget1 Comment
Engadget HD8 Comments
Engadget Mobile3 Comments

Recent Comments:

It's not a picture of the 8900. I have one in my hand....well, setting next to me anyway. The trackball area is different in the picture above as compared to the 8900 I have.
Yes! Yes! Yes! I'll have what she's having!
Amon you are right. Apple does deserve the attention they are getting because of the jump they made this past year.

The only thing that I can see that they did wrong was distribute the phone to one vendor, AT&T. Had they pushed it out to other or all carriers, they surely would have smacked down Nokia and their free phones!

I'm sure I'm like a lot of people who would rather not change their carrier just to get the iPhone...even though the iPhone is smashingly cool!

Side note...Can anyone offer up reasoning why some phone carriers offer up newly released phones at no charge while we get slammed here? Specifically, I know people in the UK that are getting phones like the Storm and Bold at no cost (new service or upgrade) and we end up paying full or close to full amount?

Cheers!
I'm with you Fuzz....I get 30MB down and 5MB up from Cablevision for $49.00.
Correct, some of us get nothing. Those that have one of the premium packages will get all the new "HD" channels they released.
Cable Girl - Correct me if I'm wrong, Cablevision owns Rainbow Holdings which owns VOOM HD, Sundance, IFC, WEtv, etc. So Cablevision, in fact, does own the VOOM HD channels.

As quoted on multiple sites: The VOOM HD Networks, the 15 all-HD channels available in the US will be shutting down sometime in January. Cablevision who owns the channels announced that due to the loss of carriage on Dish Network that they are shutting them down.

I don't think anyone is pissed at the reps, but the reps do get the brunt of anger. Why? Because the reps are the ones talking to the people. Makes sense right?

Other than people being pissed about losing the 15 VOOM channels, is the fact that Cablevision is only giving 15 channels to the people who have the premium packages. So, for those of us who do not have the premium packages, we get screwed over and get no new replacement channels. And you wonder why people are pissed?

How does Cablevision look at this as being fair to their customers? How do you see taking something away from everyone and only giving back to some as fair and/or acceptable?? It appears that your sense of right and wrong is just as much out of whack as Cablevisions.

Susie - You have to pay for the premiums. Those of us that don't have the premium channels are getting nothing in return for the loss of VOOM channels.
No complaints from movie buffs??!! How about a complaint from someone that just lost 15 HD channels that WAS included in my cable package?! Now Cablevision expects me to pay more money to get the 15 HD channels back?? Are you serious Darren? How is that not complaint worthy and how is that fair to the subscribers??

Verizon FiOS hasn't made it to my area yet, but when it does...see ya Cablevision!
should be "not right" at the end...not "night right". :)
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"With all the new multitouch capable monitors coming out, which one is the best? With the release of Windows 7 I really want a touchscreen monitor for my desktop. I'm looking to get a Full HD monitor that supports multitouch and can still look great during gaming and movies. Which one has the best specs for the price?"

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.