Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Droid review Palm Pixi Review Bold 9700
  • Rich
  • Member Since Jul 10th, 2006
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Engadget371 Comments
Engadget Mobile39 Comments

Recent Comments:

SE are clueless and haven't made a decent smartphone since the P910.

No doubt the X1 will be terrible even when it is released.
Please don't listen to anything RealityDistortion publishes. The author is the biggest mactard on the planet and lies through his teeth to make Apple look good, even when they've messed up.
And what point do you say "fuck it" and actually learn to play the guitar?
@Zak
"an iPod (also something not found on any other phone... I'm starting to see a pattern)"

How is "an iPod" different from "a media player", apart from the name? Plenty of phones have media players and plenty of phones can sync with iTunes.
@Zak
Apple claimed that the iPhone has the "whole Internet".

The Acid3 test does not indicate whether a device or browser can show the whole Internet. It only provides compliance testing for SOME web technologies.

Mobile OSX's Safari obviously scores 0% on the Flash compliance test. Whether you like it or not, Flash is used through-out the Internet.
S60's webkit browser has Flash/Java.

But this isn't about iPhone vs. Whatever. Apple lied by saying that the iPhone gives you the whole Internet. Whether you like Flash content or not, it's part of the Internet. Also, Internet != web. Where's my FTP client, Apple? ;)
"OK, step 1. Buy a dictionary and look up what a monopoly ACTUALLY is"

Maybe you should take your own advice. :)

Apple has a vertical monopoly as proven by their fix pricing activities. They do not, however, have a horizontal monopoly.
The point of this legal case isn't to get Apple to support other hardware vendors.

It's about the right of someone to legally buy a copy of the operating system - which Apple sells as a standalone product - and install it on whatever hardware they choose. Does Apple have a legal right to say how their product is used?
Why blame Nokia? It was obviously AT&T's decision to pick the worst S60 phone around.
Why did AT&T decide to release this Plain Jane when there's so many good Nokia smartphones about? Surely the N95 8GB or E71 would have been a better choice?

I assume it's not coincidence that AT&T have picked up the first Nokia smartphone in ages without WiFi...
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm in the market for a new phone and money isn't a limitation. I'm also not partial to any particular US carrier, but here are some of the features I'd like to have: WiFi, GPS, good coverage in lots of places, push Gmail (a must!), physical keyboard (a must!), a touchscreen, decent battery life and a relatively slim body. And please, nothing that has a fruit logo on it. No offense to the fruit fans, though. Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.