Except when you try to look something up on your phone, they insist on using their iPhone and you have to patiently wait while they tap-tap-taparoo it up on the 100kbps connection speeds of AT&T's 3dge network.

3dge, yes it was intentional- ponder it

If you want actual 3G connections and the ability to use UMA/Wi-Fi calling I'd say T-Mobile.

Or, you could spend the extra $5000-$100.00 a month for the 100kbps connection speeds of AT&T's 3dge network.

3dge, yes it was intentional- ponder it: ( http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2009/11/13/editorial-hey-atandt-drop-lawsuits-not-calls/ )

Like the T-100, the G1 keeps on proving that newer models may have sexier designs- but it can still triumph over the whatever the future throws at it because of the hard work of committed programmer's and designer's who made something with the intent that it was here to stay.

The Resistance will transcends and wins over SkyNet not because of newer hardware, but because it makes more efficient use of what it has no?

1. It doesn't really matter to most of those who would have bought this anymore.

2. Why? On the 25th of September 2009, the year of our Lord, Google just shut down @Cyanogen with a cease and desist order. As one of the leading ROM optimizers and developers which saved Android's consumer opinion enough to actually sway consumers away from other platforms based on the word of mouth of those with his modified ROM builds, they shattered the trust of the developer and fanatical user base at large.

I'm really very sorry if this is way off topic, but having personally convinced others to go to Android devices because of the totally Open Source promises only to have Google pull this on someone who's only generated positive "Goodwill" on their fiscal balance sheet is a smack in the face. I just can't get excited when I've got people breathing down my throat about how they may have wasted their money on 2 years of false promises and bait-&-switch policy.

This is what I've been thinking for awhile... Microsoft would've given him options and his own dev team by now...

Why in the hell is denying applications for any reason other than MALICIOUS code or content right? I swear people with Apple devices don't understand why the rest of the world thinks- not scratch that, KNOWS they are crazy for consenting to being controlled by corporations.

You are not being protected, you are being neglected... take the Red Pill and get out of the Matrix already!

Maybe the FCC could submit an app that superior to and duplicates one or several "ingenious Apple Inventions/Functions" (choking on bull excrement), have it rejected and then throw it right back in Apple's face-palmed faces...

Thank you Captain Obvious- you can put your cape away now.

BTW- recent speed tests showed T-mobile being second to Verizon, and almost doubling AT&T's 3G speeds.

Go, read, enjoy.

There's an Ap for that...

Hate to burst your bubble, but Windows 7 actually has lower system requires. But it's not like you build your own Apple or anything, and not that they'd ever let you- remember Psystar?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psystar_Corporation