"Yet before if you were in the last month of your contract it would still be $175 to terminate. If you cannot decide to drop a service after a month thats your bad"
BS. This was the WHOLE point of prorated ETF's pushed for by the government on the carriers. It dropped $5 every month and at the end youd be left with about $60 ETF a month early NOT $175
All this policy does is circumvent the whole prorated ETF policy push that the government was investigating carriers for (their ETF practices). Its REDICULOUS that you should get to the end and the ETF is still what other carriers charge after the FIRST month of service (then dropping from there).
People who defend VZW on this policy have no sense what so ever. Yes, people played the system to sell phones, so what? Its been like that for HOW LONG? 10+ years? All of the sudden now they magically want to stop this from the VERY few people who do this? Gimme a break. Its VZW trying to butt rape their customers and guarantee they dont go to another carrier or lose more customers to the iphone.
I hope the government probes VZW now and finds this practice to be against public policy and consumer rights. The fee is astronomical for an ETF and we all know carriers dont let you out except VERY extreme circumstances and even real reasons are a fight. Another poor policy by a carrier that, even though I dont support governemnt controlling business, I hope is challenged and probed into why the fee is so non-proportional.
And to the statement that a phone costs $550 and you get it for $200 and only a $175 ETF, SO WHAT? Thats the carriers incentive to get you to sign up with them and sell an affordable phone. They take a loss up front and, wow, they make it back in monthly fees. your naive if you dont think they recoup that cost in what you pay them monthly. So they should charge $200 for the phone, $350 ETF, and THEN not consider any monthly payments youve made to them leaving them with a huge ETF still? Please.......
All jokes aside there isnt THAT much difference between the newest EDGE revision and 3G (current 3.6) in real world values. The new EDGE is no slouch like 1X on CDMA by any means.
its a law blow at the traditional "iphone is a toy" line of reasoning. If it was anything else, like JUST about the 3G, they wouldnt have used an obvious iphone-like device. More mud slinging by VZW just jealous they dont have one device that can sell the numbers the iphone has, so they have to attack it.
Basically debunks any rumor VZW will be getting the iphone. Apple likely wont want to work with VZW after these kinds of shots at its device.
And that has to do with the Droid how? Trying to bash the iphone since the Droid doesnt look like itll come close to knocking it off from all the hype and bashing VZW put into it?
Lines look shorter than the one's for the Pre which didnt sell extraordinarily well.
Doesnt look like it met the hype, and maybe rightfully so. The commercials for it were cryptic at best to the general non-tech public who didnt already know what the phone was. They dont show the phone, or that its VZW or even Android really (other than Droid which most people barely know Android exists outside calling it "with Google" like Tmo).
Id be shocked if they sell a few hundred thousand this weekend, and wont come near the iphone sales the first weekend just like the Pre. Not an iphone fanboy, but for a phone taking direct shots at the iphone, it wont sell anywhere near being an "iphone killer" like the rest of the labeled devices in the near past which have failed to sell big.
What threat? nothing was done. What the hell do people expect. When you hack a phone youre leaving some kind of back door open on ANY platform, iphone or other.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"
The most commented posts on Engadget over the past 24 hours.
Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.
All VZW won is they dont have to take the ads off TV COMPLETELY. Nothing has been determined yet about modifying them.