Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide Droid review Palm Pixi Review Bold 9700
  • AlphaGeek
  • Member Since Sep 19th, 2006
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
Engadget13 Comments
Engadget HD3 Comments
Engadget Mobile2 Comments

Recent Comments:

Actually, Crono, only the original Nimitz carrier had 8 reactors. It was so massively over-powered that it was reportedly able to outrun every other ship in the battle group at speeds of 50+ knots. Subsequent carriers were equipped with two larger reactor systems.

That said, the first thing I thought is that the US Navy is the best in the world at building mobile nuclear-electric power -- it would be well within their skills to build a class of ship with sufficient continuous power-generation capacity to drive a bunch of these bad boys.

Makes a lot more sense to me to float a heavy cruiser with nuclear-electric-powered FEL armament than, say, loading up a fleet of 747s with vats of toxic chemicals and fly them in continuous orbits off the shore of North Korea just in case. Oh, wait...
Guess what: I just confirmed that the Squizz guys (who are awesome, BTW) are taking over DJ duties for Octane. Guess you're getting a big wad of Squizz whether you like it or not -- it'll just have an 'Octane' label on it.
Holy crap -- I used to know this guy. He worked for Excite@Home back in the day as a (you guessed it) UNIX sysadmin. Now that I think of it, he was one of the more drama-prone members of the sysadmin team.
That "32MB cache" claim smells like BS to me. I bet the marketing guys looked at the spec sheet for the two 1TB drives inside the box and added up the 16MB of cache on each drive, and voila -- 32MB cache!

Oh, and RAID 0 with a pair of 1TB drives? Yes, please, let's go for the world record on how much data we can lose with a single drive failure. Madness.
Looks like a urinal. If they put this into service, I give it a week at the outside before some befuddled senior citizen takes a leak on it.
I've actually been hoping for a radar-detector company to incorporate a Bluetooth GPS chipset (preferably something based on the SiRF III) into a high-grade detector so I can reduce the clutter on my dash. Bummer that they decided to keep all of that GPS goodness locked up inside the device instead of sharing with others.

Looks like my wait is going to go on a little longer. I mean, they've tried converging everything *but* a radar detector into those all-in-one GPS satnav units, so it's just a matter of time...
I find it entertaining that NewEgg's listed requirements show a CDROM drive as required and a DVD drive as "recommended", but the OS ships on DVD media. Wouldn't it make it kind of hard to install the OS if you went with only the "required" equipment? Heh.
I read somewhere else that the award amount doesn't actually mean anything, since the other company (Seven) is taking the case to the federal circuit court on appeal, which could reduce or eliminate the original award.

It's all bullshit anyway -- these patents all look alike, and less-successful tech companies think they can make a business out of suing more-successful tech companies. Sometimes that's true (NTP) but more often it's not.
Microsoft has unwittingly provided a stunningly effective justification for the existance of FairUse4WM and similar de-protection programs.
I have several of these at work, both the VGA-quality ICD-300 and the megapixel ICD-5000. They're great for doing live presentations using mobile devices, and super useful for documentation screen-shots.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I'm looking for a solid state drive, around 32 to 64GB, for use in my web server. The drive will contain my web sites and the operating system, either Windows Server 2008 R2 or Ubuntu. Large storage is handled by a separate RAID array, so capacity is not an issue. Rather, I am looking for the fastest, longest-lasting, and most reliable drive under $150 that is suitable to my application. Any thoughts? Thanks!"

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.