@%UsernameHTML%

3D cleavage is always better than 2D cleavage. :D

I can't decide which is more pathetic. Feel free to vote on yours.

1) The "grand opening" of the MS Store with a few nerds lined up outside, more excited about getting to touch a girl than anything they would buy in the store. And Lisa's attempt to get them to cheer was just sad. Way to reinforce the stereotype that nobody wants MS products guys.

2) Oprah, sounding like a complete moron, excited about getting to go in an Apple store. Then excited about the new red ipod. "Ooh! It's Red! I know nothing else about it but I'll take ten!" Way to reinforce the stereotype that Apple customers are clueless and easily distracted by shiny objects.

Hey he's an actor not a genius. Let's be thankful he at least managed to hold it right side up.

So I'm wondering how legal is this scenario...

Harry Potter book 8 comes out for the Kindle. They sell a million copies at $10. The gather statistics on the Kindle to see that people are continually re-reading it. So the publisher "pulls" the book back, refunds your $10, and re-lists it for $15.

Oh an they use the stats they gathered to target specifically the people re-reading the book and are most likely to pay the extra money for it.

At what point does this cross the line from sleazy to illegal?

You're right about the content never really being your own, which the author hinted at. But the second part of the problem he seems to miss when he says "they reached out and removed it from MY device". The concept that all these vendors do not want you to figure out is that not only is the content never really yours, but the DEVICE is not really yours either. The Kindle is theirs. You're just buying the right to use one until it breaks.

Your iPhone? joint ownership by Apple and AT&T. They try to control what you can do with it. Sure jailbreaking is tolerated now, but fast forward another 10 years and I bet you it will be completely illegal to do anything with one of these devices outside the scope of what they designed it for, and it will seem perfectly normal to prosecute you criminally if you do.

I feel like we're in a transition period deciding who owns that physical device you "paid for".

Sounds awesome!

But I can't help but wonder... Do those people replying to other comments get counted as "entered"?

I have heard that most phones will survive this kind of dip into water. HOWEVER some water does seep in and starts corroding parts, causing problems like reduced signal strength and shorter battery life. That's why the phone company will reject giving you a warranty replacement on grounds of "signs of water".

I have no proof of this, just something I heard.

I can imagine the conversation with the insurance guy now:

"My iPod got too hot and set my car on fire. The car is totalled. I need you to give me a check for the value of the car."

"No problem, sir. We'll get that right out to you."

"And don't forget to include an extra $200. My belongings, specifically my iPod, were destroyed in the fire."

@perspective:

Quick Robin, to the Engadget Archives! We need to get the video clips of the iPhone 3GS grand opening so we can see what the "A-list" social elite look and act like!

ps: I hope this comment shows up in the right place.

pps: I hope this comment shows up at all.

ppps: Engadget, your comment system sucks.

Yeah what a screwup, starting all the way back with that election where he signed up with the opportunistic beauty queen with the pregnant teen daughter, lost every debate, and looked like he was playing catchup the whole time.

No wait... that was the other guy wasn't it?