@Fara If you read the article, there's a point where it says that it'll be available in white, black, or red. I have to say that I think it'd look pretty good in all black.

It's my preferred method of cursor movement.

@kamikaze_shrimpy I, too, would like the ability to edit my posts.

Is it any better than Foxit? I'll have to give it a shot sometime.

Obligatory immature response: You suck compared to Japanese RPGs.

Thought-out mature response: Are you serious? JRPGs have grown stagnant. Western RPGs seem to be the only ones with anything resembling innovation anymore.

Obligatory even-more-immature response: Your mother sucks compared to Japanese RPGs.

Knowing Google, it'll probably be freely available for whatever system you'd like to try it on. At least eventually.

I mean, netbooks are PCs too.

Looks like a good opportunity to replace my ailing day one 360.

I LOVE YOU

You know what would be cool? A sequel.

Oh wait, they tried that. Twice.

Sigh.

It's true, although the GameCube wasn't as bad as the N64 and the Wii.

It comes with Nintendo's obsession with differentiating themselves from the competition on multiple levels. The problem extremely pronounced with the Wii because of how expensive making AAA games has become. It's more profitable for a third-party developer to make a game that PC, 360, and PS3 owners can all play than to focus on the Wii. And because the Wii can't muster the horsepower that the others can, it either misses out on games that the others get or it gets a shitty port.

If Nintendo had made the Wii equal in power to the other two consoles, they wouldn't have this problem, as the Wii controller(s) can be adapted to more traditional situations. But instead, they pulled out the duct tape.

Not that this hasn't been profitable so far, but Nintendo needs to tread carefully. They need to keep their momentum with the casual market because they've virtually thrown away everyone else.