Free TUAW iPhone app -- try it now!
AOL Tech

Engadget

FEATURES: Holiday Gift Guide Droid review Palm Pixi Review Bold 9700
Blog Activity
Blog# of Comments
TV Squad7 Comments
Cinematical5 Comments
Joystiq Nintendo1 Comment
Engadget Mobile1 Comment

Recent Comments:

the oddest part of the episode is the timing...

so, it's saturday night and they receive a 1 day rush order. That order wouldn't be received traditionally until beginning of business on monday, giving them til tuesday to deliver.

for a bunch of geniuses, they sure don't understand shipping.
They used the superbowl to promote the heck out of My Own Worst Enemy 6 months before it aired. Of course they cancelled it when they didn't get the financial return on it they had hoped.

They need money to afford to hold on to shows that need time to develop an audience. They should jack up the price of the Superbowl Commercials to offset the cost of burying money into shows they have no faith in.
Hancock 2 would not work as a sequel.

The only way it would work for me would be as a prequel - featuring more alcoholic, unlucky hero and less redemption story.

That's what we were sold on from the moment Hancock emerged - ooh, it's a hero that screws everything up - sweet! Wait, there's another and she's close to him for absolutely no reason other that plot device? Crap.

Give me drunken, homeless anti-hero.
"blowing in slots"

uh huh huh huh
Klaatu barada nikto.
oops... it cut off.

I caught a sneak preview on Tuesday for Beowulf in digital 3-d and after the pre-review on Cinematical that exclaimed that the IMAX 3D version was like watching Star Wars on the big screen for the first time, I couldn't wait.

Without 3D glasses, the movie is junk. Whereas movies based on videogames strive to translate into cinema, Beowulf strives to be a video game. Fight scenes play out like weak imitations of the PS2 game "Shadow of the Colossus". Voice acting is only saved by John Malkovich; however, even he grates 60% of the time.

It was pretty; however, it was far from consistent in its visual treatments. Secondary characters ride on horses like they were crash test dummies mounted on sticks devoid of any expression or fluidity of movement. Cut scenes are merely 3D fashion shows with completely useless fly-bys through tree limbs in reverse. Jolie will put butts in seats, but if that's all you want to see, rent Gia: she still can't act, but she's a cracked-out, naked lesbian supermodel.

No, I would not watch it on DVD, TV or any other medium sans 3D. Like the equally vomit-worthy Miami Vice movie, Beowulf would have been better off without any attachment to previous works. Other than 2 boss battles, the movie is Great Stuff... no, not as in a great movie; as in that aerosol can of spray foam that you use for filler that's highly toxic, but expands to fill a bunch of imperfections temporarily.
I caught a sneak preview on Tuesday for Beowulf in digital 3-d and after the pre-review on Cinematical that exclaimed that the IMAX 3D version was like watching Star Wars on the big screen for the first time, I couldn't wait.

Without 3D glasses, the movie is junk. Whereas movies based on videogames strive to translate into cinema, Beowulf strives to be a video game. Fight scenes play out like weak imitations of the PS2 game "Shadow of the Colossus". Voice acting is only saved by John Malkovich; however, even he grates 60% of the time.

It was pretty; however, it was far from consistent in its visual treatments. Secondary characters ride on horses like they were crash test dummies mounted on sticks devoid of any expression or fluidity of movement. Cut scenes are merely 3D fashion shows with completely useless fly-bys through tree limbs in reverse. Jolie will put butts in seats, but if that's all you want to see, rent Gia: she still can't act, but she's a cracked-out, naked lesbian supermodel.

No, I would not watch it on DVD, TV or any other medium sans 3D. Like the equally vomit-worthy
Dear McG,

Please stop ruining shows with your MTV teeny-bopper sense of style. Desaturate the color in the show a bit, stop the freeze-frame fight sequences, hire some real geeks to provide you with legitimate dorky references, and for your own sake Joseph, you're damn near 40...drop the McG.

If you're going to give this show the Fastlane treatment, at least hire Tiffani Thiessen. You are no longer "Pretty Fly (for a White Guy)".
I love the show and I was more than peeved when the news cut in for 40 minutes of it to warn people of intense drizzling in the area (120 miles south of the metro area).

One thing that bugs me are the flashbacks to the interviews with people central to the cover-up: the same Ames interview shows every episode and multiple times at that. I understand that it's not simply a cop drama, and that the whole basis of the show is a man trying to find out who framed him; however, do we really need to see the same interviews over and over? Maybe I'll chalk it up to first season jitters and worries that they need to keep doing it to fill in viewers who may have missed the earlier episodes, or maybe I'll write it off as bad editing.

The show is trying to do too much and not spend any time doing any of it: Reese's sex/drug/alcohol addiction, the elaborate frame-up, and trying to make Calamity Jane look like a woman again to name a few. Every time I see Robin Weigert, I flash back to her naked body in the bathtub in Deadwood and I get an anti-boner that not even Sarah Shahi can unplug.

New shows try to be everything we like about every other show, and they don't have to be.
Let the hive mind of Engadget get that for you.
"I own an iPhone 3G and I'm looking for a decent speaker / alarm clock for it. I am going to listen music in a mid-sized room, so I want nice quality speakers with solid bass. I also want to use it as an alarm clock, so it would be great if there is such a feature. The price can be low-mid to mid-high range. I was looking at the Klipsch iGroove SXT; it's powerful, slick and the reviews are good, but it doesn't have an alarm clock feature. It's no deal breaker if I can set it up from the iPhone, but I'm not sure. Thanks!"

Boss of the Year Entry Form

Now that we've thrown 'em off the trail, use the form below to get in touch with the people at Engadget. Please fill in all of the required fields because they're required.